They tell you the number.
We ship and prove the work.

If you've started caring whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini mention your app, you've met two kinds of product: measurement tools that track your AI visibility over time, and a managed layerthat ships the AI work and proves it. They're not competitors; they sit at different points in the same loop. Here's the honest version of that split.

What is the difference between AEO measurement and getAdvantage?

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO, sometimes GEO) splits into two jobs. Measurementanswers “how visible am I right now, and is it changing?”. You give it your brand and competitors; it runs prompts on a schedule and reports share-of-voice and trends. getAdvantageanswers “get the AI work scoped, gated, shipped and proven”. We read your app the way an answer engine does, ship the artifacts (llms.txt, JSON-LD, meta tags, FAQ schema) that close the gap, and keep a proof record of what landed. It's the managed layer for AI work, run with you, not another chart.

What do measurement tools like Peec and Profound do?

Measurement platforms track AI visibility as an ongoing metric: they run a set of prompts against multiple AI engines on a recurring schedule, report how often your brand is mentioned and against which competitors, track sentiment and share-of-voice over time, and surface trends. It's monitoring. The value is in the longitudinal number and the competitive benchmark, and it's the right tool if your job is to report on AI visibility across a brand or portfolio.

What does getAdvantage do that measurement tools don't?

getAdvantage ships the work and proves it. We take the AI work from built to deployed to verified: we scope it with you, gate the risky steps for your sign-off, ship the fixes into your build, and keep a proof record of what landed and when. As one part of that, we read your app the way an answer engine does across the 9 AI-readability signals, close the gaps, and check whether the assistants name you. getAdvantage is a managed service: you can run a check right here, then we run the whole loop with you.

Side-by-side

Measurement-tool details vary by product and plan; check each vendor's site for their current features and pricing.

Which one do I actually need: a measurement tool or getAdvantage?

If your job is to report on AI visibility across a brand or many clients and you want a metric that trends over weeks, a measurement tool is the right purchase. If you want the AI work shipped with control and proven, not just another dashboard telling you where you stand, that's getAdvantage. Measurement shows you the number; getAdvantage runs the work that moves it. Many teams use both: see the gap, ship the fixes with us, then re-measure to confirm it landed.

Is a getAdvantage check a guarantee that AI will recommend me?

No. Every check getAdvantage runs is a record of observable signals at the time of the scan, not a guarantee of any AI engine's output. No one controls what ChatGPT says. What you can control is whether your app is legible enough for an answer engine to read, quote and cite you, and that's exactly what the 9 signals cover and the work addresses. Sample output is always labelled, and the limits are stated plainly.

Does getAdvantage run its own engine on itself?

Yes. As one small piece of evidence, we run our own Get Found check on getadvantage.app and keep the reading current on the homepage. A “get found by AI” service that itself wasn't found by AI would be a fraud. Don't take our word for it: check us, then ask ChatGPT what gets your app found.